Why Does Gamification Fail? The Top 3 Reasons You Need to Know

Adam Steele

Jun 2, 2023

What makes watching a soccer game so exhilarating? It's the anticipation of goals scored, the players competing for the highest accolades, and the suspense of who will emerge as the top scorer at the end of the season. This, in essence, is a representation of what gamification can look like in a different context - the realm of sales. It's the application of elements found in games, such as scoring points, levels, and competition, to non-game activities to enhance engagement, motivation, and performance. Gamification in sales might involve rewarding points for each deal closed or creating leaderboards to foster healthy competition among team members.

The popularity of gamification is no secret. Many businesses are using it to bring a sense of excitement, engagement, and performance drive to their sales teams. It's a powerful tool with immense potential – when implemented correctly, gamification can significantly boost sales performance by tapping into the inherent human desire for competition, achievement, and recognition. But what happens when the game doesn't play out as expected? Why do some companies report significant enhancements in their sales performance post gamification while others experience a slump? This brings us to the core of our discussion on why does gamification fail.

Why Does Gamification Fail? – The Pitfall of Poorly Designed Rewards

Imagine a soccer league where the top scorer is not recognized nor rewarded. It sounds unthinkable, doesn't it? But this is precisely what happens when gamification in sales adopts poorly designed rewards systems. This pitfall, akin to not rewarding the top striker in a soccer league, demotivates salespeople, leading to subpar performance and, ultimately, the failure of the gamification initiative. The principle at play here is reinforcement, a fundamental concept in behavioral psychology.

Reinforcement in Behavioral Psychology and its Application in Sales Gamification

Reinforcement, in behavioral psychology, is about encouraging certain behaviors through rewards or punishments. In sales gamification, positive reinforcement comes in the form of rewards given for desirable actions, such as closing a deal or exceeding a sales target. This rewards system can profoundly influence the behaviors of sales team members, pushing them to strive for better performance.

However, if rewards are poorly designed or misaligned with the performance metrics, they may fail to reinforce the desired behaviors. The result? You might find your sales team disengaged and underperforming, leading to the collapse of your gamification strategy.

The Sports Analogy: A Soccer League Without Proper Recognition

Imagine a soccer league where the top scorer is neither recognized nor rewarded at the end of the season. The scoring system in soccer is not just about keeping track of goals; it's a way of recognizing and rewarding outstanding performance. If the top scorer is ignored, it sends a message to the players: your efforts and skills don't matter. This could lead to players losing interest in the game, affecting their performance on the field.

This sports analogy parallels what happens in sales when gamification adopts a poorly designed rewards system. Just like the demotivated soccer players, salespeople might also lose their enthusiasm if their efforts and achievements are not duly recognized and rewarded.

How Poorly Designed Rewards Impact Sales Gamification

Take, for instance, a gamification strategy that only rewards the top performers. This could lead to demotivation among the other team members who feel that their efforts are not appreciated. Alternatively, consider a system that rewards participation rather than performance. This could reduce the motivation to excel as there are no extra incentives for performing beyond the bare minimum.

Another common pitfall is having a rewards system that is not aligned with the company's goals. Suppose a company wants to increase customer retention but rewards salespeople based on the number of new clients acquired. In this scenario, salespeople might focus on acquiring new customers rather than retaining existing ones, contrary to the company's goals.

A successful gamification strategy, therefore, needs a well-designed reward system. It should foster healthy competition, recognize individual efforts and achievements, and align with the company's goals. Otherwise, your gamification initiative might just fizzle out like a soccer league where the top scorer goes unrecognized.

Now, a well-designed rewards system is just one piece of the puzzle. As we move to the next section, we'll dive into another vital aspect of a successful gamification strategy – skill development. After all, even the most enticing rewards are meaningless if the participants don't possess the necessary skills to succeed, aren't they?

The Main Reasons for Failure in Gamification – Ignoring the Need for Skill Development

Imagine a basketball player who's given the best pair of shoes, the most lightweight jersey, and a high-tech court but never taught how to shoot a basket. Will the player excel in the game? Of course not. This situation mirrors the common oversight in sales gamification: ignoring the need for skill development.

Skill Development in Behavioral Psychology and Gamification

In behavioral psychology, skill development is a fundamental element. It's the process of learning and honing specific behaviors that lead to the desired outcome. In gamification, skill development translates to equipping participants with the necessary abilities to succeed in the game. In the context of sales, these skills might include negotiation, prospecting, closing, and others.

Unfortunately, many gamification initiatives make the mistake of focusing only on the game mechanics (points, badges, leaderboards), while neglecting the crucial element of skill development. The result? Participants might feel unequipped or unable to improve their performance, leading to the failure of the gamification system.

The Sports Analogy: A Basketball Player Without Shooting Skills

Consider the basketball player who's never practiced shooting drills. The player has all the resources – the best shoes, the best basketball, even the best court. However, without the skill to shoot baskets, all these resources become meaningless. The player will miss shot after shot, grow frustrated, and eventually lose interest in the game.

Similarly, in sales gamification, if the participants lack the necessary skills to "play the game" and win, they might end up feeling frustrated and disengaged, leading to poor performance and potential failure of the gamification initiative.

So, a well-designed rewards system and a focus on skill development are integral to a successful gamification strategy. But there's another essential ingredient, and that's fair competition. After all, what's a game without a fair shot at winning, right? We'll explore this next in our discussion on the main reasons for failure in gamification.

Why Does Gamification Fail? – Overlooking the Factor of Fair Competition

Picture this: A boxing match where a featherweight contender is pitted against a heavyweight champion. The odds are clearly stacked against the featherweight. It's not a fair match, right? This is exactly the scenario when fair competition is overlooked in gamification. Without fair competition, participation wanes, engagement drops, and gamification efforts are doomed to failure.

Fair Competition in Behavioral Psychology and Gamification

In behavioral psychology, fair competition is a vital element for motivation. It helps foster engagement, improve performance, and sustain interest. When applied to gamification, fair competition means ensuring that everyone participating in the game has a fair and equal chance of succeeding. It’s about setting participants on an equal footing, so they feel motivated to engage, compete, and win.

If we overlook this element and create a skewed playing field, it can lead to lackluster engagement, lower participation, and ultimately, the failure of the gamification initiative.

The Sports Analogy: A Boxing Match in Different Weight Categories

Think of a boxing match. In boxing, fighters are divided into different weight categories, ensuring fair competition. A featherweight contender will never be placed in a ring against a heavyweight champion. This approach ensures that each fight is a fair contest based on skill, rather than physical size and strength.

Similarly, in sales gamification, participants need to feel they're in the right 'weight category.' They need to know they're competing against peers with similar skills and experience. Otherwise, they may feel outmatched and demotivated, just like a featherweight boxer in the ring with a heavyweight champion.

Real-World Examples of Failure Due to Overlooking Fair Competition

Consider a sales organization that rolled out a gamification initiative with a single leaderboard for all its salespeople, regardless of their years of experience or the complexity of their sales territories. The experienced salespeople with more prominent territories can quickly climb to the top of the leaderboard, while the less experienced salespeople will lag behind. The system demotivates the less experienced team members who would feel they couldn't compete fairly. In the end, the initiative will likely fail to boost sales performance and instead foster a culture of frustration and disengagement.

Contrastingly, consider another company implementing a gamification initiative with tiered leaderboards, grouping salespeople with similar years of experience and sales territories. This approach provides a fair competition environment. The result? The initiative likely succeeds in boosting sales performance and maintaining high levels of engagement across the sales force, proving that fair competition is vital for successful gamification.

So far, we've delved into why gamification initiatives may falter, focusing on the triad of effective reward systems, skill development, and fair competition. In the upcoming section, we'll pivot towards a more proactive stance, discussing solutions that leverage these behavioral psychology concepts to sidestep pitfalls and ensure the success of your sales gamification efforts. Buckle up and stay tuned!

Proactive Solutions to Avoid the Pitfalls of Sales Gamification

Turning the tide on failed gamification attempts may seem daunting. However, by understanding the behavioral psychology underpinning these failures and applying lessons learned from sports, we can chart a course to success. So, how can we ensure that our reward systems truly motivate, that we place emphasis on skill development, and that fair competition is at the heart of our gamification efforts?

Aligning Rewards with Performance: Lessons from the Soccer League

Remember the soccer league where the top scorer received no accolades? In sales gamification, the remedy lies in crafting reward systems that truly reflect performance. Salespersons who consistently meet or surpass their targets should be rewarded commensurately. These rewards can be monetary, but also consider intrinsic rewards such as public recognition, opportunities for professional growth, or more challenging assignments. The key is to ensure that rewards are meaningful and aligned with the efforts of the salesperson, thereby boosting motivation and engagement.

Fostering Skill Development: The Basketball Shooting Drills

Think back to the basketball player practicing shooting drills. Translating this to sales gamification involves creating opportunities for skill development within the game design. Consider creating mini-games or challenges focused on developing specific sales skills such as cold-calling or closing techniques. Salespeople can earn points for completing these training modules, improving their skills, and subsequently their sales performance. By incorporating skill development into the gamified experience, participants not only feel equipped to compete but also to grow professionally.

Ensuring Fair Competition: Insights from Boxing Matches

Inspired by the boxing weight categories, design your sales gamification system to ensure fair competition. This might mean creating separate leaderboards for different experience levels or sales territories. By doing so, you ensure each salesperson competes against peers with similar capabilities, fostering a sense of fair play, and maintaining high levels of motivation and engagement.

Final Thoughts

In our journey through the labyrinth of gamification, we have dissected the complexities that lead to its failure. The inherent mismatch between performance and rewards, the oversight of skill development, and the disregard for fair competition are the treacherous chasms we must navigate for successful gamification. Yet, in the intricate weave of these challenges, lie the solutions - if only we dare to delve deep into our understanding of behavioral psychology and take cues from the unlikeliest of places, like the diverse world of sports.

This newfound comprehension calls for you, the reader, to apply these solutions to your sales gamification initiatives. Make the performance and rewards align, foster skill development, and ensure a fair competitive ground. These are not mere suggestions, but potent tools that promise to transform your sales gamification outcomes. As you prepare to embark on this journey, let these words of the legendary but lesser-known hockey player, Herb Brooks, guide you: "Success is won by those who believe in winning and then prepare for that moment. Many want to win, but how many prepare? That is the big difference. A sound value system held water then, holds water today, and will hold water in the future." Let's prepare, shall we?

Outfield is pioneering sales gamification software to power CRM or any tech stack. Learn how our modern approach boosts output up to 3x.


Recent Posts